Oldest pages
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Showing below up to 100 results in range #21 to #120.
- Tools and Models (13:43, 1 August 2013)
- Storage Media (13:50, 1 August 2013)
- Approaches to software (e.g. repository systems) (13:58, 1 August 2013)
- Content Types (20:16, 1 August 2013)
- Information gathering and context (13:50, 5 August 2013)
- IOE case study: Check list for writing a business case for digital preservation (13:35, 6 August 2013)
- Top Six Reads when writing a digital preservation business case (13:45, 6 August 2013)
- The approach we took to writing the business case (13:52, 6 August 2013)
- University of St Andrews business case (13:53, 6 August 2013)
- Institute of education case study (13:56, 6 August 2013)
- How do I make the case for what I want to do? (12:51, 8 August 2013)
- When is the right time to write a business case? (14:14, 8 August 2013)
- Why are we writing a business case? (14:28, 8 August 2013)
- What resources are we focussing on? (15:00, 8 August 2013)
- Who is going to be affected? (16:41, 8 August 2013)
- What's in a business case? (15:29, 9 August 2013)
- Bishopsgate library case study (12:23, 12 August 2013)
- Strategic vision (14:26, 12 August 2013)
- When, Why, What, Who and How? (13:05, 13 August 2013)
- External context (13:50, 13 August 2013)
- Guidance pages for common practitioner challenges (as encountered in SPRUCE Mashups) (15:15, 13 August 2013)
- Other guides to writing business cases (15:27, 13 August 2013)
- Understand your collection (13:05, 19 August 2013)
- Step by step guide to building a business case (14:26, 17 October 2013)
- Lovebytes case study (19:16, 28 November 2013)
- Northumberland estates case study (20:05, 23 January 2014)
- Costs (20:10, 24 April 2014)
- Digital preservation risks (20:12, 24 April 2014)
- Digital Preservation Business Case Toolkit (15:57, 2 May 2014)
- JpylyzerRisks (15:45, 7 May 2014)
- ScapePlatformBenefits (18:14, 8 May 2014)
- ScapePlatformImplementationRisksMitigation (18:16, 8 May 2014)
- JpylyzerBenefits (16:14, 9 May 2014)
- PlanningandWatchBusinessActivity (16:23, 9 May 2014)
- Template for building a business case (16:30, 9 May 2014)
- ScapePlatformExecutiveSummary (16:31, 9 May 2014)
- ScapePlatformBusinessActivity (16:36, 9 May 2014)
- PlanningandWatchExecutiveSummary (12:42, 11 May 2014)
- PlanningandWatchBenefits (12:45, 11 May 2014)
- Executive summary (13:50, 11 May 2014)
- JpylyzerExecutiveSummary (17:34, 21 May 2014)
- JpylyzerBusinessActivity (17:37, 21 May 2014)
- Jpylyzer business case template (15:21, 22 May 2014)
- Planning and Watch business case template (10:22, 23 May 2014)
- SCAPE Platform business case template (12:41, 3 June 2014)
- Stakeholder analysis (10:57, 10 July 2014)
- Option appraisal/value for money analysis/return on investment (11:06, 10 July 2014)
- Business activity (11:08, 10 July 2014)
- Case studies (11:21, 10 July 2014)
- Institutional readiness (14:57, 4 November 2014)
- Benefits (14:30, 6 November 2014)
- File Format Assessment Factors (17:11, 16 March 2015)
- DPTrumps (15:07, 1 May 2015)
- OAIS Contents (11:54, 21 July 2015)
- SPRUCE Digital Preservation Illustrations (10:06, 14 August 2015)
- 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE (15:44, 2 October 2015)
- 1.2 APPLICABILITY (15:45, 2 October 2015)
- 1.3 RATIONALE (15:45, 2 October 2015)
- 1.4 CONFORMANCE (15:47, 2 October 2015)
- 1.5 ROAD MAP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RELATED STANDARDS (15:48, 2 October 2015)
- 1.6 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE (15:48, 2 October 2015)
- 1.7.1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (15:50, 2 October 2015)
- 1.7.2 TERMINOLOGY (15:51, 2 October 2015)
- 2 OAIS CONCEPTS (15:53, 2 October 2015)
- 2.1 OAIS ENVIRONMENT (11:09, 5 October 2015)
- 2.2.1 INFORMATION DEFINITION (11:10, 5 October 2015)
- 2.2.3 INFORMATION PACKAGE VARIANTS (11:45, 5 October 2015)
- 2.3 OAIS HIGH-LEVEL EXTERNAL INTERACTIONS (11:47, 5 October 2015)
- 2.3.1 MANAGEMENT INTERACTION (11:48, 5 October 2015)
- 2.3.2 PRODUCER INTERACTION (11:48, 5 October 2015)
- 2.3.3 CONSUMER INTERACTION (11:49, 5 October 2015)
- 3 OAIS RESPONSIBILITIES (11:49, 5 October 2015)
- 3.1 MANDATORY RESPONSIBILITIES (11:50, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2 EXAMPLE MECHANISMS FOR DISCHARGING RESPONSIBILITIES (11:51, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2.1 NEGOTIATES FOR AND ACCEPTS INFORMATION (11:51, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2.2 OBTAINS SUFFICIENT CONTROL FOR PRESERVATION (11:52, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2.3 DETERMINES DESIGNATED COMMUNITY (11:53, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2.4 ENSURES INFORMATION IS INDEPENDENTLY UNDERSTANDABLE (11:54, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2.5 FOLLOWS ESTABLISHED PRESERVATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (11:54, 5 October 2015)
- 3.2.6 MAKES THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE (11:55, 5 October 2015)
- 4 DETAILED MODELS (11:55, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1 FUNCTIONAL MODEL (11:58, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF FUNCTIONAL ENTITIES (11:59, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.1 Common Services (11:59, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.2 Ingest (12:01, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.3 Archival Storage (12:03, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.4 Data Management (12:04, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.5 Administration (12:06, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.6 Preservation Planning (12:07, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.1.7 Access (12:10, 5 October 2015)
- 4.1.2 DATA FLOW DIAGRAMS (12:12, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2 INFORMATION MODEL (12:13, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.1 Information Object (12:21, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.2 Data Object (12:24, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.3.1 Representation Information Types (12:27, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.3.2 Representation Networks (12:27, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.4.1 Content Information (12:46, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.4.2 Preservation Description Information (12:50, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.4.3 Packaging Information (12:51, 5 October 2015)
- 4.2.1.4.4 Descriptive Information (12:51, 5 October 2015)