Why: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RMacGregor (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Why should I..? | Why should I..? | ||
* Why should I worry about data loss? | |||
Why should I worry about data loss? | * Why should I worry about access? | ||
Why should I worry about access? | * Why should I make this a priority? | ||
Why should I make this a priority? | * Why can't I leave it to our IT people? | ||
Why can't I leave it to our IT people? | |||
Further information: | Further information: |
Revision as of 10:19, 31 July 2013
Questions and Answers
Why is preservation important for each of these groups/areas?
What are the benefits in relation to:
- Collections? (secure and accessible)
- Department? (fulfilling strategic objectives)
- Organisation? (ability to fulfil organisational mission, effective exploitation of assets - maximising their use)
- Users? (access to collections)
- Depositors? (trust in repository)
What are the risks in relation to:
- Collections? (information loss)
- Department? (inability to fulfil strategic objectives)
- Organisation? (reputational damage, loss of income generating capacity with lack of access to assets)
- Users? (loss of access to collections)
- Depositors? (lack of confidence in repository)
Why should I..?
- Why should I worry about data loss?
- Why should I worry about access?
- Why should I make this a priority?
- Why can't I leave it to our IT people?
Further information:
- Strategy documents (collections development policies, organisational/departmental strategies, mission statements)
- Risk assessment methodologies
- Sample business cases
- Preservation case studies - horror stories and success stories