Ways to engage? language? (e.g. IT: 'business continuity', ITIL): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BVanDerWerf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
BVanDerWerf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For most repositories it is not the intention to become an IT delivery organisation. However many of the action related to digital preservation are executed by IT, either in-house or outsourced or in the cloud. This implies that thinking in terms of IT governance frameworks (COBIT, TOGAF) or IT delivery frameworks (ITIL) and adopting language and terminology will promoted explicit and clear digital preservation requirement to IT delivery. | For most repositories it is not the intention to become an IT delivery organisation. However many of the action related to digital preservation are executed by IT, either in-house or outsourced or in the cloud. This implies that thinking in terms of IT governance frameworks (COBIT, TOGAF) or IT delivery frameworks (ITIL) and adopting language and terminology will promoted explicit and clear digital preservation requirement to IT delivery. This approach connect to what [Rauber] | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 31 July 2013
For most repositories it is not the intention to become an IT delivery organisation. However many of the action related to digital preservation are executed by IT, either in-house or outsourced or in the cloud. This implies that thinking in terms of IT governance frameworks (COBIT, TOGAF) or IT delivery frameworks (ITIL) and adopting language and terminology will promoted explicit and clear digital preservation requirement to IT delivery. This approach connect to what [Rauber]