Difference between revisions of "Talk:2.2.3 INFORMATION PACKAGE VARIANTS"

From wiki.dpconline.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:


During discussion recently I suggested that  something like a "Transfer Information Package" could be a useful concept to include in the OAIS. That would be for things being transferred to an organization that then does some additional appraisal and arrangement before creating a SIP to be ingested and turned into an AIP. I would be interested to hear if others thought this would be a useful addition or just redundant.--[[User:Euanc|Euanc]] ([[User talk:Euanc|talk]]) 14:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
During discussion recently I suggested that  something like a "Transfer Information Package" could be a useful concept to include in the OAIS. That would be for things being transferred to an organization that then does some additional appraisal and arrangement before creating a SIP to be ingested and turned into an AIP. I would be interested to hear if others thought this would be a useful addition or just redundant.--[[User:Euanc|Euanc]] ([[User talk:Euanc|talk]]) 14:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure there is a huge problem to be solved here, but in line with the later steps in the lifecycle it would seem useful to have standard terminology for a package of content as it reaches the OAIS. This of course relates to ISO 20652:2006 and to discussions around the possible addition of a [[Pre-ingest]] stage [[User:PRWheatley|PRWheatley]] ([[User talk:PRWheatley|talk]]) 14:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:22, 11 July 2016

Transfer Information Package

During discussion recently I suggested that something like a "Transfer Information Package" could be a useful concept to include in the OAIS. That would be for things being transferred to an organization that then does some additional appraisal and arrangement before creating a SIP to be ingested and turned into an AIP. I would be interested to hear if others thought this would be a useful addition or just redundant.--Euanc (talk) 14:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure there is a huge problem to be solved here, but in line with the later steps in the lifecycle it would seem useful to have standard terminology for a package of content as it reaches the OAIS. This of course relates to ISO 20652:2006 and to discussions around the possible addition of a Pre-ingest stage PRWheatley (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)