File Format Assessment Plans: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AkikoKimura (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===British Library=== | ===British Library=== | ||
For currently published formats assessments are [[File Formats Assessments | here]]: | |||
Formats assessments in the pipeline are: WAV, ODT, MP3 and GML | |||
===Harvard Library=== | |||
We have already assessed: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats and disk images. Our assessments can be found [https://wiki.harvard.edu/confluence/display/digitalpreservation/Format+Assessments here]. | |||
We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans) and Adobe DNG | |||
===Library of Congress=== | ===Library of Congress=== | ||
We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images | |||
Latest revision as of 15:50, 31 August 2016
Avoiding duplication is a key aim of our collaboration to produce file format assessments. Participants should record their plans to develop any file format assessments for 2015/2016 here:
British Library
For currently published formats assessments are here:
Formats assessments in the pipeline are: WAV, ODT, MP3 and GML
Harvard Library
We have already assessed: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats and disk images. Our assessments can be found here.
We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans) and Adobe DNG
Library of Congress
We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images