File Format Assessment Plans: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
We have already assessed and will exposing in the next few months: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats | We have already assessed and will exposing in the next few months: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats | ||
We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans), Adobe DNG and | We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans), Adobe DNG and disk images | ||
Formats assessments in the pipeline are: | Formats assessments in the pipeline are: spreadsheets | ||
===Library of Congress=== | ===Library of Congress=== | ||
We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images | We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images |
Revision as of 16:40, 30 March 2016
Avoiding duplication is a key aim of our collaboration to produce file format assessments. Participants should record their plans to develop any file format assessments for 2015/2016 here:
British Library
For currently published formats assessments are here:
Formats assessments in the pipeline are: WAV, ODT, MP3 and GML
Harvard Library
We have already assessed and will exposing in the next few months: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats
We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans), Adobe DNG and disk images
Formats assessments in the pipeline are: spreadsheets
Library of Congress
We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images