Digital preservation risks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* DRAMBORA http://www.repositoryaudit.eu/about/ | * DRAMBORA http://www.repositoryaudit.eu/about/ | ||
* SPOT Model | * SPOT Model | ||
'''How do you prioritise risk?''' | |||
'''PRESERVATION''' | '''PRESERVATION''' | ||
SPOT model | SPOT model |
Revision as of 08:36, 31 July 2013
How do you describe risk?
Auditing Options
- DRAMBORA http://www.repositoryaudit.eu/about/
- SPOT Model
How do you prioritise risk?
PRESERVATION
SPOT model
- availability (long-term use...)
- identity (referencibility...)
- persistence
- renderability (use and retain sig. char.)
- understandability (interpretation of content)
- authenticity (digital bit or rendered form is what it is supposed to be)
- security
CURATION
- responsibility (who is actually responsible)
- rights and licensing, use/re-use
- IP
- sensitivity (access control)
- who adds value
ORGANISATION
- capability and skills (skills gap)
- succession planning
- MANDATE (local, institutional, national, international)
- usability
- marketing/surfacing/relevance
- value of asset, reputation of asset
- accruing value, impact, re-use, evidence
- measuring and metrics
- understand the long-term vision if the data is view over a long/short-term
- managing expectations of use
- value of materials against strategy
- what happens when the organization no longer values the collection?
- flow of resources to keep activity going (sustainability)
- respond to external factors
- institutional sustainability
- organization maturity (are they ready to care for these assets)
- risk profiles (are they similar to physical or organization structure) are we making assumptions?