Develop a structure for the business case toolkit and preservation support pages: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ... | Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ... | ||
When, Why, What, How, Who | When, Why, What, How, Who | ||
Maureen Pennock reporting back: | |||
Define what we thought should go in a business case then work back to what we might need to help people right. this breaks down into a series of tasks: | |||
*Exec Summary | |||
*Strategic vision (where do we want to be) | |||
*Understand the collection | |||
*Understand the context / landscape | |||
*Fit to organizational mission | |||
*What are the risks facing the collection / institution | |||
*Prioritisation of risks | |||
*List of benefits - Value, ROI | |||
*Costs of action and inaction | |||
*Resources needed, institutional readiness (Skills / resourcs / stakeholders) | |||
*Practical recommendations over a short period (and risks associated with them) |
Revision as of 14:32, 30 July 2013
Brain storm for the development of the business case for preservation
Neil Grindley reporting back his breakout group: Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ... When, Why, What, How, Who
Maureen Pennock reporting back: Define what we thought should go in a business case then work back to what we might need to help people right. this breaks down into a series of tasks:
- Exec Summary
- Strategic vision (where do we want to be)
- Understand the collection
- Understand the context / landscape
- Fit to organizational mission
- What are the risks facing the collection / institution
- Prioritisation of risks
- List of benefits - Value, ROI
- Costs of action and inaction
- Resources needed, institutional readiness (Skills / resourcs / stakeholders)
- Practical recommendations over a short period (and risks associated with them)