Difference between revisions of "Develop a structure for the business case toolkit and preservation support pages"

From wiki.dpconline.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ...
Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ...
When, Why, What, How, Who
When, Why, What, How, Who
Maureen Pennock reporting back:
Define what we thought should go in a business case then work back to what we might need to help people right. this breaks down into a series of tasks:
*Exec Summary
*Strategic vision (where do we want to be)
*Understand the collection
*Understand the context / landscape
*Fit to organizational mission
*What are the risks facing the collection / institution
*Prioritisation of risks
*List of benefits - Value, ROI
*Costs of action and inaction
*Resources needed, institutional readiness (Skills / resourcs / stakeholders)
*Practical recommendations over a short period (and risks associated with them)

Revision as of 14:32, 30 July 2013

Brain storm for the development of the business case for preservation

Neil Grindley reporting back his breakout group: Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ... When, Why, What, How, Who

Maureen Pennock reporting back: Define what we thought should go in a business case then work back to what we might need to help people right. this breaks down into a series of tasks:

  • Exec Summary
  • Strategic vision (where do we want to be)
  • Understand the collection
  • Understand the context / landscape
  • Fit to organizational mission
  • What are the risks facing the collection / institution
  • Prioritisation of risks
  • List of benefits - Value, ROI
  • Costs of action and inaction
  • Resources needed, institutional readiness (Skills / resourcs / stakeholders)
  • Practical recommendations over a short period (and risks associated with them)