Develop a structure for the business case toolkit and preservation support pages: Difference between revisions

From wiki.dpconline.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ...
'''Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ...
When, Why, What, How, Who
When, Why, What, How, Who
when to include:
long term vision/approach
short term componenets - staff, storage, etc
who to include:
community/stakeholders
- type of organisation - business objectives, documentation,scale & maturity
what to include:
- characterisation
- case studies
content sudit etc
why to include:
- benefits
- risks
threats
how
costs
audience/language
granularity over time


'''Maureen Pennock reporting back:
'''Maureen Pennock reporting back:

Revision as of 14:55, 30 July 2013

Brain storm for the development of the business case for preservation

Neil Grindley reporting back his breakout group: Useful to think about a simple interrogatory approach ... When, Why, What, How, Who

when to include: long term vision/approach short term componenets - staff, storage, etc

who to include: community/stakeholders - type of organisation - business objectives, documentation,scale & maturity

what to include: - characterisation - case studies content sudit etc

why to include: - benefits - risks threats

how

costs audience/language granularity over time


Maureen Pennock reporting back: Define what we thought should go in a business case then work back to what we might need to help people right. this breaks down into a series of tasks:

  • Exec Summary
  • Strategic vision (where do we want to be)
  • Understand the collection
  • Understand the context / landscape
  • Fit to organizational mission
  • What are the risks facing the collection / institution
  • Prioritisation of risks
  • List of benefits - Value, ROI
  • Costs of action and inaction
  • Resources needed, institutional readiness (Skills / resourcs / stakeholders)
  • Practical recommendations over a short period (and risks associated with them)

Discussion These are noticeably different approaches but they reinforce each other. The when/who/what/how questions are 'real english' and they work well to provide questions that are useful and also immediately understandable. But it won't steer you through a large wad of stuff. The headings are more 'cookie-cutter' giving the outline of everything that would be needed. These two approaches are not mutually incompatible.