File Format Assessment Plans: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Harvard Library=== | ===Harvard Library=== | ||
We have already assessed | We have already assessed: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats and disk images. Our assessments can be found [https://wiki.harvard.edu/confluence/display/digitalpreservation/Format+Assessments here]. | ||
We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans) | We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans) and Adobe DNG | ||
===Library of Congress=== | |||
We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images |
Latest revision as of 15:50, 31 August 2016
Avoiding duplication is a key aim of our collaboration to produce file format assessments. Participants should record their plans to develop any file format assessments for 2015/2016 here:
British Library
For currently published formats assessments are here:
Formats assessments in the pipeline are: WAV, ODT, MP3 and GML
Harvard Library
We have already assessed: video formats, word processing formats, CAD formats and disk images. Our assessments can be found here.
We are currently assessing: image sequences (e.g. film scans) and Adobe DNG
Library of Congress
We are currently assessing: ODF format family; e-mail, instant message and calendaring formats; disk images