File Formats Assessments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AkikoKimura (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
AkikoKimura (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|[[File:FileFormatsMainBlue.jpg|link=File assessment strategy]] | |[[File:FileFormatsMainBlue.jpg|link=File assessment strategy]] | ||
| | | | ||
=== Assessment Strategy === | [[=== Assessment Strategy ===|link=File assessment strategy]] | ||
The assessment strategy defines the framework around which file formats are assessed. Specifically, it defines 9 points of principle aimed at informing the implementation of format assessments, as well as the sustainability factors by which each format will be assessed. | The assessment strategy defines the framework around which file formats are assessed. Specifically, it defines 9 points of principle aimed at informing the implementation of format assessments, as well as the sustainability factors by which each format will be assessed. | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 18:45, 16 February 2015
|
link=File assessment strategy The assessment strategy defines the framework around which file formats are assessed. Specifically, it defines 9 points of principle aimed at informing the implementation of format assessments, as well as the sustainability factors by which each format will be assessed. |
Preservation Risk Assessments by Broad Format Type
Completed format assessments grouped by broad format type will appear here. Note, these lists do not represent recommendations for each type, they just categorise the full list appearing on the right.
|
|
|
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
| Item a | Item b | Item c |
| Content a | Content b | Content c |