File Formats Assessments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AkikoKimura (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
AkikoKimura (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[File:Icon PDF 200.jpg|100px|link=PDF assessment | |[[File:Icon PDF 200.jpg|100px|link=PDF assessment temp]] | ||
|[[File:Icon TIFF 200.jpg|100px|link=TIFF assessment | |[[File:Icon TIFF 200.jpg|100px|link=TIFF assessment temp]] | ||
|[[File:Icon JP2 200.jpg|100px|link=JP2 assessment | |[[File:Icon JP2 200.jpg|100px|link=JP2 assessment temp]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 19:04, 16 February 2015
=== File Assessment Strategy ===
The assessment strategy defines the framework around which file formats are assessed. Specifically, it defines 9 points of principle aimed at informing the implementation of format assessments, as well as the sustainability factors by which each format will be assessed. |
Preservation Risk Assessments by Broad Format Type
Completed format assessments grouped by broad format type will appear here. Note, these lists do not represent recommendations for each type, they just categorise the full list appearing on the right.
Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
Item a | Item b | Item c |
Content a | Content b | Content c |